Gwen Mueller is an IT Professional, #dnd Gamer-girl, #coffee drinker, geek in Secondary Education, editor on tumblr #education, curating #science, and #tech resources to inspire lifelong learning with 1/4 cup of #fun.
Where is the line of appropriate contact? As an educator, I would not want people posting items to my personal page nor calling me at home uninvited. How much training do we provide for our staffs about issues like this? Connecting with parents and students through personal pages? Are mandates and policies needed? Guidelines?
Does it make sense to ban texting if students ignore the ban and teachers back away from enforcing it? Can a ban be enforced? How about in a large course, can it be enforced then? Should it be enforced? What are the costs of enforcing a “no texting” policy? Public altercations with students that erode the climate for learning in the classroom? But texting itself erodes the learning atmosphere of classroom, doesn’t it?
What about taking the “if-you-can’t-beat-them-join-them” approach?
Does texting show a lack of respect? Perhaps, but are students doing it because they want to disrespect the teacher?
Is the strength of an institution’s “culture of teaching” or policy support for teaching and learning reflected in faculty members’ pedagogical practices?
Are “cultures of teaching” more prevalent at institutions with “learner centered” policies?
Do the relationships between institutional policies, faculty cultures, and teaching practices differ across institutional types?
It’s follow-up-fri and I wanted to share some of the responses.
betheteacheryouloved: “…very interesting article, particularly because it addresses a population not discussed very often on #Education: adult students…”
calebryandavis: “I think we should incorporate technology into education more and more as technology grows, instead of running away from it.”
itsjusthighschoolman: “I’m a freshman in High School, and of my 4 teachers, each one has a different policy…”
adventuresinemmaland:“…I am in 3rd grade. I can think of very few reasons for students at this age to have cell phones…”
cerulean-tea: “School policy is at teacher discretion. I say out of sight until independent work time and only for research.”
lhuddles: “no unless specifically invited for a task/assignment (a la BYOD)”
Those that “can use”:
eninsevil: “only allowed to text silently people in the room”
ajd92: “I will let them use them for the first 5 minutes and final 5 minutes of class unless we are testing.”
aperture-turret: “Our school CAN use cellphones however certain websites are blocked and teachers are always on high alert”
wildlywandering: “In my class, students can use phones to google/wikipedia (but they should ask first..”
Those that “can’t”:
crystalofftheclock: “School policy, not allowed (in bags only). Confiscated and only parents may pick up from the office — students’ responsibility to inform.”
mrsjdr: “Not in my 4th grade class. It stays in a locker all day, if out I take it and a parent has to come pick it up from school. Mostly a non-issue.”
amiteachingyet: “First grade, nope. Losing/breaking/”borrowing” too much of an issue at this age. Had to hold an iPhone Touch today until after school.”
littlestwampum:“I’m at a Middle School where students turn theirs in during homeroom and they are locked in a closet until the end of the day.”
jhwolford: “School policy = NO WAY. I look other way if students use to complete work. My desktops in classroom are 10 years old, take 5 min to power on.”
irrationallylogical: “Totally unnecessary for my class, thus please keep them stowed away and quiet”
Student opinions:
madisonrayeee: “I think as long as the teacher is not teaching that we should be alowed to have them out.”
edwindrg:“Don’t believe it’s respectful to professor or peers”
dontjudgemeplz1: “If i were a teacher I’d give my students 10 mins at the end of class to use their cell phones because they’re going to use them anyway”
isaywhatineedtosay: “as long as the students work and pay attention to the teacher i dont see why the students cant use their phones.”
aster-e-aster-bunnymund:“let kids use them if theyr’e done with their work and during all study halls.”
clockwork-minds:“I’m a student, but my teachers have a rule where if they catch you on your phone, they can take it and give it back to you the following day.”
A big thanks to those that commented, please know I really appreciate reading your thoughts and getting your perspective.
“The hard truth about teacher evaluation policy reform is that it is unlikely to be effective in the absence of other reforms aimed at dramatically improving teacher supply and retention.”
The push for the “parent trigger” option for turning around struggling schools continues, with new laws under consideration in 12 states’ legislative sessions, even as such laws already on the books remain unused in all but one of the seven states that have them.
The growing use of standardized tests to assess students and teachers is sparking a push-back nationwide in what has become one of the greatest divides in educational policy. Even as the federal government and major school districts in Chicago, New York and elsewhere continue to promote testing, counter-pressure is growing to step back from it.
“Here is a question…what if a kid is really shy and now you implement participation marks to bring them out of their shell. What if it doesn’t work? The student may already have anxiety about talking and NOW you are punishing them extra for their lack of participation. That is a HUGE double whammy.”
“We’re caught in this perfect storm between our human comfort level with the rate of change we’d prefer, and the high-speed rate of change that is being foisted on us by evolutions in technology,” says Lewis. “And this is only going to get increasingly difficult for us as these evolutions happen more and more swiftly.”
The article is largely about BYOD initiatives, and how a few schools have had issues keeping up their AUPs (Acceptable Use Policy) and problems with discipline. Overall, their 4 tips to BYOD policy are good:
A bipartisan group of legislators has introduced a bill that would require college coursework as a condition of graduating from high school. The move would increase the number of students going to college, make their degrees more affordable and encourage students not considering college to continue in higher education…
I’m not sure this infographic is truly informative, but it’s interesting that it starts off by promoting SMS/Text marketing to connect students with resources. Online Colleges suggests using texting to notify, remind, and inform, but is that really useful in the classroom related to learning?
While students may own a smartphone, until schools provide smartphones and data plans to faculty or services you’re already using (like D2L/Moodle/etc) that allow you to text your students, I’m not sure how this works and truly transforms the classroom. Overall the suggestions are weak.
However - that brings up some questions from me, as our high school uses SMS/Text opt-in services for critical notifications (school closings) only. Are you using any systems/resources that allow you to text your students? Does your school policy allow it? Do you use it for “marketing” school events? Why not just use Twitter?
Many proponents of private school choice take for granted that schools won’t participate if government asks too much of them, especially if it demands that they be publicly accountable for student achievement. Were such school refusals to be widespread, the programs themselves could not serve many kids. But is this assumption justified?
Spoiler: Only 25% of schools said that testing requirements were very/extremely important to choosing if they would participate. Here’s what they found:
Regulations that restrict student admissions and schools’ religious practices are more likely to deter school participation than are requirements pertaining to academic standards, testing, and public disclosure of achievement results;
Curriculum and testing requirements ranked among the least important considerations for school leaders, with just 25 percent citing state assessment rules as very important in their decision to participate or not;
Only 3 percent of non-participating schools cited governmental regulations as the most important reason to opt out;
The reasons most cited by school principals for participating in voucher programs were expanding their mission in the community (87 percent), helping voucher-eligible families already enrolled in their schools (75 percent), and aiding needy children in the community (72 percent);
About one-third of non-participating private schools cited a lack of eligible families in their vicinity as key to their decision to shun the program; and
Catholic schools are most likely to participate in choice programs, regardless of the regulatory environment.
We often hear from principals about all the things they’d like to do but that are impossible due to circumstances beyond their control. Perhaps the most commonly cited sources of frustration are, first, teachers’ contracts and, second, state and federal policies that tie the principals’ hands when it comes to teacher assignment, compensation, hiring, professional development, instructional time, and much else.
12 educators, many of them well known in online-education circles, did manage to draft a document that they hope will serve as a philosophical framework for protecting the interests of students as online education, propelled and complicated by the rise of MOOCs, hurtles into a new phase.
Those rights should include access and privacy, along with access to information about the financial models of institutions and companies offering online courses, write the authors.